Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Apple will become luxury fashion brand according to twitter.com/Futureurope

Apple become luxury fashion brand by hiring P.Deneve (ex-CEO of Yves Saint Laurent & others fashion companies including Lanvin, Nina Ricci), said Apple insider https://twitter.com/Futureurope

Apple did not say exactly what special projects Deneve will be working on, but the Bloomberg news agency reported that he will be reporting directly to CEO Tim Cook.
The new vice-president's background in fashion has fuelled speculation that he was brought on board to help design Apple's new device, which some suspect will be some form of wearable computing, possibly a "smart" watch.
Earlier this week, suspicion that Apple would be coming out with a wearable device some time in the future grew stronger after it was reported that the company had submitted an application to trademark the term iWatch in Japan.
Cook suggested at a technology conference earlier this year that wearable computing devices have potential to be the next new hot technological gadgets, saying this area of consumer technology was "ripe for exploration."
Some analysts had also speculated that Deneve might be put in charge of Apple's retail division, which has been plagued by several rocky departures of top executives, including John Browett, who was fired as vice-president of retail a mere seven months after he was hired.
But the technology website ZDNet reported Wednesday that Deneve would not be in charge of the company's retail stores.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

How Google hire

Focus on behavioral questions in interviews, rather than hypotheticals. Bock said it’s better to use questions like, “Give me an example of a time when you solved an analytically difficult problem.” He added: “The interesting thing about the behavioral interview is that when you ask somebody to speak to their own experience, and you drill into that, you get two kinds of information. One is you get to see how they actually interacted in a real-world situation, and the valuable ‘meta’ information you get about the candidate is a sense of what they consider to be difficult.”
Consistency matters for leaders. “It’s important that people know you are consistent and fair in how you think about making decisions and that there’s an element of predictability. If a leader is consistent, people on their teams experience tremendous freedom, because then they know that within certain parameters, they can do whatever they want. If your manager is all over the place, you’re never going to know what you can do, and you’re going to experience it as very restrictive.
GPAs don’t predict anything about who is going to be a successful employee. “One of the things we’ve seen from all our data crunching is that G.P.A.’s are worthless as a criteria for hiring, and test scores are worthless — no correlation at all except for brand-new college grads, where there’s a slight correlation,” Bock said. “Google famously used to ask everyone for a transcript and G.P.A.’s and test scores, but we don’t anymore, unless you’re just a few years out of school. We found that they don’t predict anything. What’s interesting is the proportion of people without any college education at Google has increased over time as well. So we have teams where you have 14 percent of the team made up of people who’ve never gone to college.”
That was a pretty remarkable insight, and I asked Bock to elaborate.
“After two or three years, your ability to perform at Google is completely unrelated to how you performed when you were in school, because the skills you required in college are very different,” he said. “You’re also fundamentally a different person. You learn and grow, you think about things differently. Another reason is that I think academic environments are artificial environments. People who succeed there are sort of finely trained, they’re conditioned to succeed in that environment. One of my own frustrations when I was in college and grad school is that you knew the professor was looking for a specific answer. You could figure that out, but it’s much more interesting to solve problems where there isn’t an obvious answer. You want people who like figuring out stuff where there is no obvious answer.”

Thursday, March 28, 2013

UN charitable learning system for programmers - against hacktivism

Global union and charitable learning system for programmers.

In the ever-sprawling hacking movement, the United Nations, together with Google are developing a program of socialization of programmers.

According to an Edward Mushinski  source from the endowment fund Google  Endowed Scholarship, the program will offer free online courses for learning new technologies, such as software for mobile applications. The only condition would be to join the Union of IT-specialists (IT-workers Union, ITWU).

ITWU will be a specialized UN agency, which aims to involve young people in socially useful work, their employment and the protection of their rights.
Funding for these activities will be carried out initially charity Google Endowed Scholarship (http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/ugradscholars/google.html), which also will contribute all the companies that have signed the UN Global Contract on social responsibility (http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/languages/russian/GC_Brochure_Russian.pdf).

Due to this flow of charitable contributions (and turnover of philanthropy is about 300 billion dollars a year), the courses will maintain the most highly paid guru IT. Their participation will ensure the interest is all the programmers to participate in the union.

In the opinion of the editorial board, motivated Google to participate in this program is quite a selfish desire to attract the best minds of the programmer in its ecosystem of Android.

John Connor
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003231967366

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Facebook has hired the team at online reputation system Legit


The company changed names two times, starting out as Quantifi before the name was changed to Cred and then Legit. It also changed its approach to online reputation numerous times as well.
Legit started life as consumer-first reputation site, where users could go to make sure that the person they were dealing with was not a con artist. But it didn't work because "a system requiring a person to go to a different site for reputation information before proceeding with a transaction on a marketplace presented too much friction."
Also, most people who used sharing servies did not seem to need additional sources of trust, so the company wasn't solving a problem most people had. 
The company then developed an embeddable widget " that would integrate into a user’s reputation profile within a marketplace." This failed, though, because "marketplaces want control of their User Experiences."
After that, the company built the LRG, its cross-platform reputation system. Partners who joined the LRG contributed user reputation data specific to their marketplace. Legit aggregated and analyzed this data and returned a LegitReport and LegitScore summarizing the user’s reputation across all marketplaces.
Legit also provides real-time alerts to LRG partners that were sent when Legit becomes aware of a significant reputation event on a marketplace, like a crashed car or vandalized apartment.
Despite that they " were not able to achieve Legit’s vision", Barton and Boyle say that the lessons they learned "feed our excitement about Facebook."
"On Airbnb, Facebook is used to tell you if your host went to the same college, or whether a friend of yours has stayed there before you. When you sign up for Lyft, you have no option but to connect with your Facebook account to provide proof of your identity," Barton and Boyle wrote.
"Facebook is a core piece of infrastructure for many marketplaces as the source of your offline authenticity and reliability. While we will be working on other initiatives within Facebook, we remain huge advocates of the Sharing Economy / Collaborative Consumption and are confident the movement will continue to grow."
The news was first reported by TechCrunch on Monday.

Read more at http://vator.tv/news/2013-03-19-facebook-hires-team-from-online-reputation-site-legit#8thFRubWf4FA4B7Z.99 

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

The most wanted educational startups


1. Codecademy.com offers game-based online courses that teach people of all ages and experience levels how to code
2. Coursera.org Founded by Stanford computer science professors, Coursera provides access to courses from top-tier universities for free. 
3. Lore.com Formerly known as Coursekit, this company got its start in late 2011. Since then, it has raised over $24 million to fund its goal: to become a real competitor to education management platform Blackboard, partly by incorporating a wealth of social features into the site
4/ Udacity.com Former Stanford professor and Google VP and researcher Sebastian Thrun launched this online education venture earlier this year. Udacity hopes to bring high-quality university classes to as many students as possible, free of charge. How does it make money? If students want certifications for the skills they’ve learned, they can pay to take a test at one of the company’s testing centers. 
5. Clever.com - has built up a successful business model over the past year. The company helps educational institutions develop apps for managing student information by making it easier to access student data from Student Information Systems. Since launching, the company has earned more than $3 million in funding and has doubled the number of schools it works with from 1,000 to 2,000
6. Coursera wants to bring classes from top-tier universities to the Web for free.  On the platform, students can sign up for classes on everything from business and technology to sociology and literature. Students can’t earn degrees through the site, but a student could use it as a credential that opens up new opportunities. The startup has said that it plans to  match employers with people who have performed well in classes on its platform
7. Voxy.com
There are a lot of companies out there vying for supremacy in the online language-learning market
8. knewton.com/
9. Udemy.com is unique because it allows anyone to take or build an online course, not just colleges and universities. Instructors can implement videos, PowerPoints, zip files, audio files, and PDFs to create a course and share it with the world. The site offers courses on technology, business, music, art, languages, math, science, games, sports, and more.
The basic premise is to crowdsource education.
  • TutorVista – started by offering online tutoring to Western students using tutors in India. All you can eat for $99/month or so. They burned millions on search engine marketing and were able to build a business that generated eight figure revenue — nice but not enough to IPO on. So they pivoted and opened education centers in India and were acquired for $213 million by Pearson. A $200+ million acquisition in India is unheard of.
  • Tutor.com – started a decade ago to offer online tutoring to the masses. Never went mainstream, even after 5 rounds of funding. They’ve built a niche business that survives through deals they’ve struck with various government bodies — libraries, schools, etc.
  • GlobalScholar – started by the CEO of Drugstore.com, tried initially to do a direct to consumer play. Realized it wasn’t working and bought an electronic gradebook company that works with schools and was sold to Scantron that has great distribution with schools.
VENTURE CAPITAL MAGNET
Fans of the project respond that the files are safer in the database than scattered about school districts. Plus, they say, the potential upside is enormous, with the power to transform classrooms across the U.S.
Does Johnny have trouble converting decimals to fractions? The database will have recorded that - and may have recorded as well that he finds textbooks boring, adores animation and plays baseball after school. Personalized learning software can use that data to serve up a tailor-made math lesson, perhaps an animated game that uses baseball statistics to teach decimals.
Johnny's teacher can watch his development on a "dashboard" that uses bright graphics to map each of her students' progress on dozens, even hundreds, of discrete skills.
"You can start to see what's effective for each particular student," said Adria Moersen, a high school teacher in Colorado who has tested some of the new products.
The sector is undeniably hot; technology startups aimed at K-12 schools attracted more than $425 million in venture capital last year, according to the NewSchools Venture Fund, a nonprofit that focuses on the sector. The investment company GSV Advisors tracked 84 deals in the sector last year, up from 15 in 2007.
In addition to its $100 million investment in the database, the Gates Foundation has pledged $70 million in grants to schools and companies to develop personalized learning tools.
New products regularly come to market, but both educators and entrepreneurs say adoption has been slow because of technical hurdles.
WARNING SYSTEMS TO FORESTALL DROPOUTS?
Schools tend to store different bits of student information in different databases, often with different operating systems. That makes it clunky to integrate new learning apps into classrooms.
At the Rocketship chain of charter schools, for instance, administrators must manually update at least five databases to keep their education software running smoothly when a child transfers from one teacher to another, said Charlie Bufalino, a Rocketship executive.
The extra steps add expense, which limits how many apps a school can buy. And because the data is so fragmented, the private companies don't always get a robust picture of each student's academic performance, much less their personal characteristics.
The new database aims to wipe away those obstacles by integrating all student information - including data that may previously have been stored in paper files or teacher gradebooks - in a single, flexible platform.
Education technology companies can use the same platform to design their software, so their programs will hook into a rich trove of student data if a district or state authorizes access.
That prospect has some companies dreaming big.
Larry Berger, an executive at Amplify Education, says the data could be mined to develop "early warning systems." Perhaps it will turn out, for instance, that most high school dropouts began to struggle with math at age 8. If so, all future 8-year-olds fitting that pattern could be identified and given extra help.
Companies with access to the database will also be able to identify struggling teachers and pinpoint which concepts their students are failing to master. One startup that could benefit: BloomBoard, which sells schools professional development plans customized to each teacher.
The new database "is a godsend for us," said Jason Lange, the chief executive of BloomBoard. "It allows us to collect more data faster, quicker and cheaper."
Whether all this data, and all the programs that use it, will transform education is another question. Most data-driven software has only been tested on a small scale; results are often mixed.
Though he is bullish on the sector, Michael Moe, the chief investment officer at GSV Capital, cautions that there is as yet no proof the new technology will produce "game-changing outcomes" for students - or, for that matter, sterling profits for investors.
There are lots of opportunities, especially if you take a long term view of it and want to build something meaningful for the next 25 years. However, don’t make the following mistakes:
  • Don’t believe that building a better product will make you successful. Delivering something for cheaper will. Even if that cheaper thing is lower quality. This is usually repugnant to most well-educated entrepreneurs.
  • Don’t start in developed, western countries because that’s where large, Internet businesses have been built. Asia is a much better education market if you want to target consumers.
  • Don’t take VC funding because the growth curve in your education business will not live up to VC expectations early on. Take angel money from people who want to make a difference in education. Then take private equity money once you’ve figured out how to get to $10 million in revenue on your own. Even better, don’t take any PE money and grow it on cash flows. Successful education businesses are often not capital constrained.
  • Don’t target suburban or urban, middle class users with disposable income. You’ll build a niche business that can’t go mainstream.
Others are more skeptical still.
"The hype in the tech press is that education is an engineering problem that can be fixed by technology," said Frank Catalano of Intrinsic Strategy, a consulting firm focused on education and technology. "To my mind, that's a very naive and destructive view."

Friday, January 4, 2013

Business Intelligence about future mobile domination


an outline of how mobile devices are waging the battle for the living room:
  • Substitution: In a recent in-depth research, BI found that mobile video is mostly complementary to traditional TV viewing. Mobile video is additive, creating more opportunities for watching video — whether it's watching a sitcom on your smartphone during a train commute, or viewing a Netflix movie at home in bed.
  • Source: The ability to relay high-quality video (including online video and games) wirelessly places mobile in competition with a whole galaxy of devices. Wireless TV connections are becoming increasingly common, and with them, the ability to bring smartphones and tablets more easily into the mix.
  • Selection: When hand-held mini-tablets and smartphones are able to send signals to audiovisual equipment and home theaters, consumers gain more flexibility with a remote control based on a smartphone or tablet. Many apps, with attractive displays and intuitive touch-screen interfaces, are being developed for TV. As Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes recently said, competition in the TV interface space is heating up, and we're going to see "as many interfaces as you can get."
  • Synchronization: In the US, 85% of U.S. tablet owners use their tablet while watching TV. In order to leverage the second screen as a companion to what's happening on the TV, media companies must successfully migrate consumers from self-initiated use of the second screen to a programmed experience.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Top prediction: techno trends 2013


predictions on Quora. In 2013, experts say the service, we will see:

- Mass cheap tablets, which will be the standard for the education market;
- IPhones with NFC - that finally Made market for this type of mobile payments mass;
- Flexible screens smarfonov from Asian manufacturers;
- Hypermedia, aggregating content multiformat media and social networks and automatically compress the stream into an information product

Deloitte Tech Trends 2013 preview

1. Mobile should be top of mind for organizations. But don’t limit your ideas to Mobile First. Think Mobile Only, imagining an untethered, connected enterprise. The next wave of mobile may fundamentally reshape operations, businesses and marketplaces – delivering information and services to where decisions are made and transactions occur. And the potential goes far beyond smartphones and tablets to include voice, gesture and location-based interactions; device convergence; digital identity in your pocket; and pervasive mobile computing. The very definition of mobile is changing


2. Businesses are no longer building technologies just to enable interaction – they are now engineering social platforms for specific context. These platforms can relieve, rather than serve traditional organizational constraints such as deep hierarchies, command-and-control cultures, physical proximity and resource concentration. Social Reengineering can fundamentally transform how work gets done, but it isn’t just a “project.” It’s a strategy.


3. 

Gamification Goes to Work

Driving engagement by embedding gaming in day-to-day business processes